Second Appeal No. 197 of 1990 dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of parties. Previous adjournment conditional warning issued for court year-old pending appeals.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:63711
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 197 of 1990
Appellant :- Chhotkun Singh Respondent :- Ram Vijai Singh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- H.S. Sahai,Mohd. Shahnawaz Khan,Rakesh Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- Vinod Kumar Singh Ii
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The appeal is of the year 1990. The appeal is listed under the head that the cases shall not be adjourned as the appeal is of the year 1990. The matter was listed on 04.08.2023, on which date, the Court had passed the following order which reads as under:-
"1. It has been stated by Shri Ankit Misha, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant that arguing counsel is in personal difficulty and sought an adjournment for the day.
2. Shri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
3. List this matter in the next cause list.
4. It is made clear that no adjournment will be granted on the next date of listing as the appeal is of the year 1990 and has yet not been admitted."
Today none appears for either of the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 ank
Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Chhotkun Singh
Ram Vijai Singh
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
