The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench dismissed the second appeal for want of instructions from the appellant's counsel. The counsel stated they had no instructions in the matter.
None. Appeal dismissed for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:82198
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 109 of 1993
Appellant :- Sultan Ahmed Respondent :- Hafeez Beg Counsel for Appellant :- B.K. Saxena,Smt. Priti Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- K.L. Gurnani
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the second appeal is dismissed for want of instructions .
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sultan Ahmed
Hafeez Beg
Jaspreet Singh
Rabindra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
