Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution after a failed oral hearing due to the absence of the appellant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 3190 of 2014
Appellant :- Cholamandalam Respondent :- Smt.Madhulika Singh And 8 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pranjal Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- Ankur Mehrotra, ,Anil Kumar Tripathi,Janardan Singh Yadav,Nagendra Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal.
The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 24.8.2023 Vipasha
[Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.]
Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Cholamandalam
Smt. Madhulika Singh And 8 Others
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
