The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition because the revisionists explicitly stated they did not wish to press the revision. The order was recorded as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:204685
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 698 of 2023
Revisionist :- Manvendra Sharma @ Choty And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kamal Ji Kesharwani,Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jeet Bahadur Singh
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri V.N. Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kamal Ji Kesarwani, learned counsel for the revisionists states that revisionists do not want to press the revision.
In view of above submission, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
This order has been passed in presence of Sri Jeet Bahadur Singh, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2.
Order Date :- 27.10.2023 P.P.
Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Manvendra Sharma @ Choty And 4 Others
State of U.P.
Another
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
