Criminal revision proved unpressed by counsel; High Court dismissed the petition without addressing substantive issues, discharging any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 677 of 2022
Revisionist :- Hariom Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not want to press the present criminal revision and therefore it may be dismissed as not pressed.
The present criminal revision is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 7.2.2023 SK Srivastava
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hariom
State of U.P.
Another
Shiv Shanker Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
