The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. challenging an interim maintenance order. The delay of 134 days was rejected as unexplained, and the revision was found devoid of merits.
Revision dismissed; condonation of 134-day delay rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:106306
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 553 of 2023
Revisionist :- Chetan Swaroop Alias Chetanya Swaroop Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Radheshyam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Order Date :- 16.5.2023 Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay of 134 days in filing the criminal revision is justified in the absence of explanation.
Whether the criminal revision challenging the maintenance order has any merit.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Chetan Swaroop Alias Chetanya Swaroop
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
