The High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the accused against the trial court order denying leave to cross-examine the victim under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding the application was an abuse of process intended to delay the trial.
Nulla
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:127277
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 549 of 2023
Revisionist :- Ajeet Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Satish Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
appears that the instant application has been filed with oblique purpose; apparently either to win over the witness or delay the trial.
Order Date :- 19.6.2023 Vijay
Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to cross-examine the victim was a misuse of process of law intended to delay the trial.
Whether the trial court was justified in closing the evidence of the victim and dismissing the revision petition.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ajeet
State Of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
Vijay Kumar Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
