This criminal revision challenging the rejection of an application to recall a Section 145 Cr.P.C order was dismissed. The court held intervention was unnecessary as ownership proceedings were pending in the consolidation court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 305 of 2005
Revisionist :- Brij Nath And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ramesh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
consolidation court.
Order Date :- 12.4.2023 Vinod.
Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the SDM was required to intervene under Section 145 Cr.P.C when ownership litigation was pending in consolidation court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Brij Nath And Others
State of U.P. and Others
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
