Deena Nath Gupta v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1294 of 2023
Revisionist :- Deena Nath Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Kumar Mall,Laike Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist, Ms. Jyoti Bhushan, learned counsel appears for opposite party nos.2 to 4 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he wants to withdraw the instant criminal revision with liberty to file fresh petition as provided under law. Therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The instant revision is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Certified copy of the impugned judgment and order shall be returned to the learned counsel for the revisionist after retaining a photo copy of the same to be kept on record, if any.
Name of Ms. Jyoti Bhushan, Advocate be shown as learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 to 4.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 A.N. Mishra
Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Deena Nath Gupta
State Of U.P.
Other Opposite Parties
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court