In this criminal revision, the appellant challenged a Family Court order granting Rs.8,000/- maintenance as excessive. The High Court found no illegality or infirmity in the lower court's judgment and dismissed the revision.
The criminal revision petition was dismissed, upholding the maintenance award of Rs.8,000/- made by the Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:219110
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5885 of 2023 Revisionist :- Arvind Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Pawan Kumar Patel, Sonam Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 17.11.2023 S.P.
Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned maintenance order granting Rs.8,000/- to the opposite party was illegal or an infirmity existed. Check to see if the appellate court deemed it excessive or beyond capacity to pay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arvind Kumar
State of U.P.
Reena Devi
Prashant Kumar
Sanjay Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
