The High Court dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous on the ground that the revisionist had been acquitted after the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:138168
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 545 of 2020
Revisionist :- Manoj Yadav @ Sonu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Revisionist :- Raj Kishor Mishra,Sandeep Kumar Tiwari,Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajeev Upadhyay
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist has been acquitted after the trial, therefore, this criminal revision has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 12.7.2023 Suraj Srivastav
Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Manoj Yadav @ Sonu
State Of U.P. And Anr
Subhash Chandra Sharma
Suraj Srivastav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
