Allowed

X (Juvenile) v. State of U.P. and Anohter

Allahabad HC21 Aug 2023CRLR/5377/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal revision filed by a juvenile through his mother against bail rejection orders. The Court set aside lower court orders for not properly applying Juvenile Justice Act provisions and modified the bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders set aside; delinquent released on bail with conditions regarding study, association, and reporting to Probation Officer.

X (Juvenile) Vs State of U.P. and Anohter — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:168014

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5377 of 2022

¶4

Revisionist :- X (Juvenile) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anohter Counsel for Revisionist :- Prashant Sharma,Dushyant Singh,M.C. Singh,Pankaj Sharma,Satendra Singh,Shiv Shanker Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kailash Pati Singh Yadav,Satish Kumar

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionis, Sri Kailash Pati Singh Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his mother under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "J.J. Act, 2015) to allow the present revision and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 2.12.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act) Ist, Hathras in Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 2022 (Bal Apchari Vs. State of UP), whereby the appeal filed by the revisionist has been rejected and the earlier order dated 29.10.2022 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Hathras by which the bail application of the revisionist has been rejected in Case Crime No 320 of 2022 under Sections 302/34 IPC, Police Station - Sadabad, District - Hathras and also prays to release the revisionist/delinquent on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶8

It is submitted that in this case the delinquent/applicant was aged about 16 years at the time of alleged incident and is in Child Care Home since 16.8.2022 (i.e. about one year). It is further submitted that FIR was lodged against some unknown culprits and during investigation his name was brought in light on the basis of the statement of Somveer, Yukti and Dharmveer recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.. During trial statement of all the aforesaid witnesses have been recorded in which they have not supported the prosecution version and declared hostile and even during their cross examination by learned Prosecutor nothing was found to support the case. There is nothing adverse to the interest of the

¶9

delinquent. The report submitted by the D.P.O. is also not adverse for the present delinquent even though the juvenility of the delinquent was not considered either by the J.J. Board or by the appellate court and also the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act were not considered by the courts below while passing the aforesaid orders. The delinquent is in Juvenile Care Home since 22.4.2022 (i.e. more than one year). and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside the orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the present criminal revision as the orders passed by the courts below cannot be said to be in conformity with law.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A., perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the District Probation Officer, the medical examination report of the victim and the period present delinquent remained in child care home, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶12

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 29.10..2022 and the appellate court dated 2.12.2022 are, hereby, set aside and the present criminal revision is hereby, allowed.

¶13

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on executing person bond by the revisionist (mother of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-

¶14

(i) The natural guardian/mother will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the mother will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶15

(ii) The natural guardian/mother will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at

¶16

the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶17

(iii) Juvenile and the natural guardian/mother will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶18

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶19

Order Date :- 21.8.2023 S.K.S.

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

X (Juvenile) v. State of U.P. and Anohter

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

X (Juvenile) v. State of U.P. and Anohter

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

X Juvenil Vs State of U.P. and Another

Minor X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

A Vs State of U.P. and Another

X- (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Xxxxxx (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

X (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another