In a criminal revision against a bail rejection order, this court observed that the revisionist, a juvenile who has attained majority, had similar circumstances to co-accused granted bail. Consequently, the revision was allowed.
Revisionist released on bail on terms identical to those granted to co-accused persons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5075 of 2022
Revisionist :- X Juvenile Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kuldeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
age of majority. Learned counsel for the accused revisionist submits that the role of the accused revisionist having on similar footing and having identical role, may be enlarged on bail.
Order Date :- 3.2.2023 Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisionist entitled to bail given co-accused granted bail and attainment of majority.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
X Juvenile
State of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Arun K. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
