Ved Prakash Awasthi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:234743

Court No. - 82

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4669 of 2022

Revisionist :- Ved Prakash Awasthi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Satya Prakash Rathor,Ashish Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist against the Judgement and Order dated 01.02.2022 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Mahoba in Case No. 153 of 2020 (Smt. Anjali @ Maya Vs. Ved Prakash), under Section-125 Cr.P.C., Police Station-Khanna, District-Mahoba whereby the revisionist was directed to pay an amount of Rs. 3,000/- per month in favour of opposite party No. 2 as maintenance from the date of application.

¶8

Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the order dated 01.02.2022 is an ex-parte order granting maintenance to the opposite party No. 2.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection that learned counsel for the revisionist may move an application under Section 126 Cr.P.C. giving him an opportunity of hearing.

¶10

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this revision is disposed of with a direction that in case the application is moved by the revisionist under the appropriate provision within a period of one month from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, if there is no other legal impediment.

¶11

With the aforesaid observation, the criminal revision is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.12.2023 Shivani

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ved Prakash Awasthi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ved Prakash Awasthi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Bakhru Lal Mahadev and 2 Others

Pushpa Solanki and 4 Others Vs Shriram General Insurance Company Limited and 2 Others

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Neelam and 6 Others

Sachin Sahu @ Sachin Kumar Sahu Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Naresh Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Bulbul and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another