The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad held that Criminal Revision No. 441 of 2015 filed by Kalu Ram is now infructuous due to the pendency or disposal of related proceedings consequent upon which the revision cannot be entertained and is accordingly dismissed.
Revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 441 of 2015
Revisionist :- Kalu Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Sri Manan Kumar Chaubey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist, states that this revision has been rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.2.2023 Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kalu Ram
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Arun K. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
