Allowed

X- Minor v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Oct 2023CRLR/4353/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal revision filed by a juvenile to set aside impugned orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and Sessions Court. Finding that the lower courts failed to apply judicial mind to Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and the DPO report, the Court quashed the orders and directed the juvenile's release on bail with undertakings and supervision conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders of JJB and Appellate Court set aside; revision allowed; respondent delinquent released on bail by person bond with sureties on conditions.

X- Minor Vs State of U.P. and Another — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:196957

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4353 of 2023

¶4

Revisionist :- X- Minor Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vivek Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Nagesh Kumar

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Vivek Prakash Mishra learned counsel for the revisionist as well as Sri Nagesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party alongwith learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act-2015 (hereinafter referred to as "J.J. Act, 2015) to allow the present revision and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 06.07.2023 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Varanasi in Misc. Case No.109 of 2023 as well as order dated 03.08.2023 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Criminal Appeal No.139 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No.552 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 506, 323, 120-B, 114, 115 & 34 I.P.C., Police Station Chaubepur, District Varanasi and also prays to release the revisionist/delinquent on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶8

It is submitted that in this case the delinquent/applicant was aged about 17 years and was juvenile at the time of alleged incident. Further submitted that F.I.R. was lodged against unknown persons but during investigation the name of the revisionist was also brought into light on the basis of statement made by the mother of the deceased. It is also submitted that statements of Sameer and Anil Yadav were recorded by the I.O. but name of the revisionist was not disclosed anywhere. Later on the statement of the mother of the deceased was recorded in which she inducted the name of the revisionist. There is no any evidence on record to show the complicity of the revisionist in commission of the offence with other co-accused persons those have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The report submitted by the D.P.O. is also not adverse for the present delinquent even though the juvenility of the delinquent was not considered either by the J.J. Board or by the appellate court and also the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act were not considered by the courts below while passing the aforesaid orders. The delinquent is in Juvenile Care Home since 31.03.2023 and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside the orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the present criminal revision as the orders passed by the courts below cannot be said to be in conformity with law.

¶9

Learned counsel for the opposite party as well as learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A., perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the District Probation Officer, the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail and the role of the present delinquent, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶11

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 06.07.2023 and the appellate court dated 03.08.2023 are, hereby, set aside and the present criminal revision is hereby, allowed.

¶12

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on executing person bond by the revisionist (father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-

¶13

(i) The natural guardian/father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶14

(ii) The natural guardian/father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶15

(iii) Juvenile and the natural guardian/father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶16

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶17

Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Ashok Gupta

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

X- Minor v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

X- Minor v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

X Minor (Juvenile) Vs State of U.P.and Another

Aky - Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

'S' Son of Dev Narayan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mohd. Yakub Nizami Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X- Minor Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

M/S Maxico Sports Nawab Core Building and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another