The High Court in Criminal Revision No. 3519 of 2008 dismissed the present appeal as infructuous after the case against the revisionist was finally decided on 16.06.2010 following a confession, rendering further proceedings unnecessary.
Criminal Revision No. 3519 of 2008 is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3519 of 2008
Revisionist :- Sohan Singh Gaud Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Smt. Rajkumari Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in revised call. None has appeared for revisionist. However, Shri Ghanshayam Kesarwani, learned AGA for the State is present.
As per report of Juvenile Justice Board, the case against the revisionist is finally decided on 16.06.2010 after confessing the case.
Learned AGA points out that the present criminal revision is infructuous due to finally decide the case against the revisionist.
Accordingly, the present case is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.2.2023 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
