Allowed

Juvenile X Minor v. State of U.P. Another

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2023CRLR/3295/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal revision and set aside orders of Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court, holding they failed to consider Section 12 of JJA and DPO report. Delinquent released on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders of JJB (5.5.2023) and Appellate Court (26.5.2023) set aside; delinquent released on bail with personal bond and two sureties under specified conditions.

Juvenile X Minor Vs State of U.P. Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:147596

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3295 of 2023

¶4

Revisionist :- Juvenile X Minor Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for revisionist, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record.

¶7

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act-2015 (hereinafter referred to as "J.J. Act, 2015) to allow the present revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 26.5.2023 passed by learned Juvenile Court, Bijnor in Criminal Appeal No. 62 of 2023 as well as order dated 5.5.2023 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Bijnor. Further prayed to stay the operation of the aforesaid orders and to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 375 of 2020, under Sections 302, 201, 404 IPC & Section 3(2)5 S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Nehtaur, District Bijnor.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case, the delinquent was juvenile aged about 17 years, 8 months and 5 days at the time of alleged offence. F.I.R. was lodged against unknown person and during investigation the name of present delinquent was brought into light on the basis of his confessional statement, when he was arrested by the police in pursuance of information given by the Mukhbeer Khas. False recovery of mobile and scarp of cloth was also said to be recovered from the shop of the delinquent. There is nothing on record to connect the delinquent with the offence. There is nothing adverse to the present delinquent in the report as submitted by the District Probation Officer. The provisions as contained under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as appellate court while rejecting the appeal which cannot be said to be in conformity with the law. The delinquent is in Juvenile Care Home since 18.10.2020 i.e. more than two and half years and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside the order passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the aforesaid prayer.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A., perusal of record, the period

¶11

of delinquent remained in Juvenile Care Home, the provisions as contained u/s 12 Juvenile Justice Act and report submitted by the D.P.O. it appears that J.J. Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶12

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 5.5.2023 and the appellate court dated 26.5.2023 are, hereby, set aside and present Criminal Revision is hereby, allowed .

¶13

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing personal bond by the revisionist (father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions:-

¶14

(i) The revisionist/father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶15

(ii) The revisionist/father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶16

(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶17

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board, concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶18

Order Date :- 25.7.2023 A. Singh

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Juvenile X Minor v. State of U.P. Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juvenile X Minor v. State of U.P. Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

X (Minor) Vs State of U.P.and 3 Others

Surendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

X (Minor) Vs State of Up and Another

Anil Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

X- Minor Vs State of U.P. and Another

X Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and Another