Revisionist failed to appear. Counsel for respondent reported petitioner did not pay maintenance awarded for minor daughter. Court found no good ground to entertain the revision.
Revision dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:157029
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3080 of 2023
Revisionist :- Sunil Kumar Gawaskar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Kumar,Shailendra Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shriman Narayan Tiwari,Uma Dutt Shukla
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 4.8.2023 Ujjawal
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL PARJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision should be entertained given the non-payment of maintenance.
Whether the factum of non-recovery of dues is a good ground to interfere.
Sunil Kumar Gawaskar
State Of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
