The High Court dismissed a criminal revision challenging the rejection of an application for discharge. The court held that sufficient material exists to proceed with the trial despite the nature of injuries.
The revision petition is dismissed as no merit is found in the exercise of revision jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2912 of 2022
Revisionist :- Adarsh Yadav @ Mulayam Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajeev Kumar Saxena,Virendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 6.1.2023 Abhilash
Digitally signed by :- ABHILASH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether material exists on record to proceed against applicants under Section 326 IPC.
Whether Section 326-A IPC is confined to acid attack injuries.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Adarsh Yadav @ Mulayam Yadav And 3 Others
State of U.P. and Another
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
