Dinesh Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:127045 Court No. - 71 Case :-…
No. - 2023:AHC:127045 Court No. - 71 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:127045
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2831 of 2023
Revisionist :- Dinesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ajeet Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Nitesh Kumar Singh,Rabindra Tiwari
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist states that the present revision has become infructuous.
In view of the statement so made, which has not been disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, the revision has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 16.6.2023 Mini
Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Yadav
State Of U.P.
Another
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court