A miscellaneous order dismissing a criminal revision filed against an order framing charge as infructuous since the trial had already concluded by the time of consideration.
Revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:35986
Court No. - 31
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 251 of 2010
Revisionist :- Girja Shanker Verma And Ors. Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Syed. Mohd. Munis Jafari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Learned counsel for the Revisionists has submitted that the instant revision was filed against the order framing charge against the accused. Latter on, the trial itself has been concluded. So by efflux of time this revision has been rendered infructuous.
Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.5.2023
n.u.
Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Girja Shanker Verma And Ors.
The State Of U.P.
Another
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
