A criminal revision filed by a minor was dismissed as infructuous because the revisionist had already been acquitted by the Juvenile Justice Board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2455 of 2022
Revisionist :- X (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shashi Prakash Pandey,Hemant Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Saurabh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Hemant Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present revision has become infructuous due to acquittal of the revisionist by the Juvenile Justice Board.
In view of the above, present revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 1.5.2023 T. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
X (Minor)
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
