Criminal Revision accepted by Learned Counsel for Revisionist challenging Principal Judge Family Court order dated 4.3.2023. Revision dismissed at admission stage due to lack of documentary proof of bigamy.
Revision dismissed at stage of admission without consideration of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1838 of 2023
Revisionist :- Sharafat Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Present criminal revision has been preferred to set aside the order dated 4.3.2023 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly by which the application of the opposite party No. 2 under Section 127, Cr.P.C. has been rejected and the application of opposite party No. 3 has been allowed.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
After perusal of the judgment, it appears that the revisionist had not produced any document with regard to bigamy by the opposite party No. 2. It is further observed that the revisionist has stated about the bigamy on the basis of the information received from the other persons.
The revision is dismissed at the stage of admission.
Order Date :- 3.5.2023 T. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision should be allowed to set aside the Family Court order rejecting Section 127 Cr.P.C. application.
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Tripti Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
