Dismissed
Mukesh Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCCRLR/1826/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:232354 Court No. - 79 Case :-…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. - 2023:AHC:232354 Court No. - 79 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232354
Court No. - 79 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1826 of 2022 Revisionist :- Mukesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Alok Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Alok Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist states that due to passage of time, the present criminal revision has become infructuous.
In view of above statement of learned counsel for the revisionist, the criminal revision is dismissed as the same has become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 7.12.2023/sailesh
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision has become infructuous due to passage of time.
Mukesh Kumar
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court