The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous because the charge sheet was filed on 12.03.2023, stating no further orders were required.
No further orders were required; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7073 of 2023
Petitioner :- Shanidev And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 3 filed by Sri Yadvendra Singh, Advocate be taken on record.
Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Yadvendra Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 and Sri Manish Kumar Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned A.G.A. states that the charge sheet has been submitted on 12.03.2023.
In view of the statement made by learned A.G.A., no further orders are required to be passed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.5.2023 Ved Prakash
Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanidev And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Siddhartha Varma
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
