Petitioner challenged an order recalling further investigation via a criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The court held the petitioner had no locus standi to challenge the order and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed; no direction given to authorities to reinvestigate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:141390-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4906 of 2023
Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kalyan Sundram Srivastava,Satyam Shivam Sundaram Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
Order Date :- 17.7.2023 Nitendra
Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order recalling further investigation is liable to be quashed by the High Court by a Criminal Misc. Writ Petition?
Whether the petitioner who is an accused has locus to challenge an order directing or staying further investigation in a criminal case?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan Kumar
State Of U.P.
Senior Superintendent of Police
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
Vivek Kumar Birla
Surendra Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
