Laik Ahmad v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:236736 Court No. - 80 Case :-…
No. - 2023:AHC:236736 Court No. - 80 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236736
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4576 of 2014
Petitioner :- Laik Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
List revised.
None appeared on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner even in the revised call except learned A.G.A. for the State.
Office report shows that steps has not been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner for service of notice in compliance of order passed by this Court.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Suraj Srivastav
Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Laik Ahmad
State Of U.P.
Subhash Chandra Sharma
Suraj Srivastav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court