Disposed

Ramvir Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC19 Jul 2023CRLP/4392/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to ensure compliance with his earlier order dated 24.12.2020, which related to forged bail bonds and surety papers in proceedings under Sections 107/116 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the SDM to ensure compliance of the order passed on 24.12.2020 and to take necessary action within two months.

Ramvir Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:143232

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4392 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Ramvir Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bheshaj Puri Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with prayer to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 Sub-Divisional Magistrate to consider and decide the application of the plaintiff-petitioner submitted before him in Case No. 03203 of 2019 (Computerized Case No. T201912070303203) (State Vs. Jagvir Singh and others).

¶8

It is submitted by leaned counsel for the petitioner that in this case, proceedings under Sections 107/116 Cr.P.C. were initiated by the learned S.D.M. on the basis of an application moved by the petitioner which was finally disposed of vide order dated 24.12.2020 in Case No. 1179/T2019. In the order in question the proceedings were ordered to be terminated on account of efflux of period of six months. Further submitted that an application was moved by the petitioner before the learned S.D.M. that the bail bonds filed by the opposite parties were forged regarding which officer incharge of police station Ushava was directed to make an inquiry and submit report but till today the compliance of this part of the order could not be ensured by learned S.D.M., therefore, requested to direct him to ensure the compliance of the order passed by him on 24.12.2020 regarding application filed by the petitioner in relation to bail bonds filed by opposite party under Sections 107/116 Cr.P.C.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard.

¶10

On considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perusal of record, it appears that an application was moved by the petitioner before the learned S.D.M. against opposite parties who have filed

¶11

forged bail bonds and papers relating to the surety regarding which an order was passed by learned S.D.M. as aforesaid regarding which submission is made to direct the learned S.D.M. to ensure the compliance of the order. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of finally with direction to the learned S.D.M. to ensure the compliance of the order passed by him on 24.12.2020 and to take necessary action, if it is required, in accordance with law within a period of two months.

¶12

Order Date :- 19.7.2023 A. Singh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramvir Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramvir Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Bind Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Abdul Rahman @ Dhondhu (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

X- Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and Another

X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Juvenile X (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

X(Juvenile) Vs State of U.P. and Another