Petitioner in criminal miscellaneous writ petition stated he did not wish to press the petition.; Court dismissed the petition as not pressed without granting liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101886-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2982 of 2023
Petitioner :- Hafizurrahman Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Akhtar,Sufiya Bano Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present writ petition.
In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. It is made clear that no liberty has been granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Order Date :- 11.5.2023 Aditya Tripathi
Digitally signed by :- ADITYA TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hafizurrahman
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
