A criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the counsel for the petitioners stated that the petitioners had already been arrested.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:99839-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2217 of 2023
Petitioner :- Haridwar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kundan Rai Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Dharmendra Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have already been arrested.
In view of the statement so made, it is clear that the petition has been rendered infructuous.
It is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.5.2023 Shivani
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Haridwar And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
