The High Court dismissed Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 18042 of 2011 for want of prosecution as no representative from the petitioner side appeared before the court despite being on the previous date.
Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:216054
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18042 of 2011 Petitioner :- Balle And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Agnivesh,Jadu Nandan Yadav
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Sri Pranvesh, Advocate, holding brief of Jadu Nandan Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent submits that on the previous date also no one was present from the side of petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in arguing this case.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.11.2023 G.S
Digitally signed by :- GHAN SHYAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Balle and others
State of U.P. and another
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
