The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an F.I.R. regarding theft and non-arrest of petitioners, holding no case for interference under Bhajan Lal principles.
Dismissal of the writ petition seeking quashing of FIR and non-arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:217763-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17817 of 2023
Petitioner :- Daybar And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gunja Kanogiya,Shiv Lal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
(Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh) decided on 07.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.
Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Ved Prakash
Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grounds of quashing of F.I.R. under Section 379 IPC are established in the present case?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and othersReferred¶11
State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 · Who else cites this
M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of MaharashtraReferred¶11
M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 · Who else cites this
Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar PradeshReferred¶11
Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.3262/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Daybar And 2 Others
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Birla
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
