The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR forAttempted Robbery and related charges. The court rejected the argument that a pending civil dispute should lead to quashing, finding no merit in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:220764-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16664 of 2023
Petitioner :- Hemant Banswal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pratik Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Anil K. Sharma
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the quashing of an FIR can be granted on the ground that a civil dispute exists and a commercial arbitration is pending.
Whether the parameters laid down in State of Haryana and others Vs. Bhajan Lal and others are satisfied in this case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana and others Vs. Bhajan Lal and othersDistinguished¶11
State of Haryana and others Vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 · Who else cites this
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Hemant Banswal And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
