Petition to quash FIR dismissed as petition filed via video-conference with no counsel appearing to press the petition led to want of prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16531 of 2023
Petitioner :- Batukeshwar Pratap Singh Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 13.12.2023 Anil K. Sharma
(Vinod Diwakar, J.) (Vivek Kumar Birla, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Batukeshwar Pratap Singh
The State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
