Mahipal and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition for quashing of FIR dismissed as infructuous due to filing of charge-sheet.
What did the court decide?
None. The writ petition was dismissed.
Writ petition for quashing of FIR dismissed as infructuous due to filing of charge-sheet.
None. The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:198942-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16211 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mahipal And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Rai,Abhyudaya Tripathi,Avesh Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Ujjawal
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL PARJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahipal And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court