Criminal miscellaneous writ petition dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner did not dispute the prosecution's submission that a charge-sheet was filed after investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:209037-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16089 of 2023 Petitioner :- Saraiya @ Suraiya Bano And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Pati Singh Yadav,Sheo Prasad Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Amar Singh Yadav,Dilnawaz Ahmad Khan
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU YADAV MAYANK KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Saraiya @ Suraiya Bano And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
