Writ petition dismissed as infructuous since petitioners 1, 3, and 4 remain charged while petitioner 2 dropped; no appearance by petitioner counsel.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:190950-DB
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15594 of 2023
Petitioner :- Vijay Gupta And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Case called out. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. states that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner no. 1-Vijay Gupta, petitioner no. 3- Gauri Shankar Gupta and petitioner no. 4 Kamlawati Devi and the name of petitioner no. 2- Doodhnath has been dropped from the report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.
In view of the statement made by the learned A.G.A., the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 M. Tarik
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Gupta And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Rahul Chaturvedi
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
