Petitioner filed a writ petition for quashing an F.I.R. contending he was not named in it. The court held that without being named in the F.I.R., the petitioner lacks locus standi, resulting in dismissal of the petition.
Writ petition dismissed for lack of locus standi; right to apply for bail reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:195207-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14487 of 2023
Petitioner :- Soni Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Narayan Singh,Ram Bahadur Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Jai Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 10.10.2023 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file a writ petition for quashing of F.I.R. when his name is not mentioned in it
Whether the writ petition is maintainable under these circumstances
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Soni
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
