Petitioner withdrew criminal miscellaneous writ petition intending to pursue alternative remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Court dismissed the petition consequentially.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:181067-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13775 of 2023
Petitioner :- Phool Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Maurya,Sanjay Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Indra Pal Singh Rajpoot
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Sri Indra Pal Singh Rajpoot, learned counsel for the respondent.
After some argument in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner intends to pursue the remedy available to him under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 19.9.2023 SP/-
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Phool Singh
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
