Vikash Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR, the High Court held that defence arguments cannot be entertained in quashing proceedings. The Court found that allegations clearly disclosed cognizable offences and serious nature, rendering the prayer misconceived. The petition was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Quashing of the First Information Report dated 27.06.2023 is rejected.