Madan and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court held that the submission regarding the victim's age was a defence applicable during trial and not for quashing, and since allegations were serious and disclosed cognizable offences, the petition was misconceived.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners prayer to quash the First Information Report is rejected. The writ petition is dismissed.