Allowed

Ramveer v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 May 2023CRLA/9857/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal appeal regarding a bail application, the High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting bail. The court held that the lower court failed to properly consider the dispute and that the appellant faced one-sided investigation with overcrowding issues. Bail was ordered with specific conditions for conduct and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

The order rejecting bail was set aside, and the appellant is directed to be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties.

Ramveer Vs State of U.P. and Another — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:113540

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9857 of 2022

¶4

Appellant :- Ramveer Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ramesh Chandra Yadav,Manjesh Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pradeep Kumar

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the appellant; learned AGA for opposite party no.1; Sri Vaishali Kushwaha, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant to set aside the impugned order dated 13.09.2022, whereby the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Amroha has rejected the bail application of the appellant moved by him in Case Crime No. 464 of 2022, under Sections 308, 34, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Gajraula, District Amroha.

¶9

There are allegations against the appellant of committing offences of attempt to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder, beating and threatening of a person belonging to schedule case with common intention along with three other co-accused.

¶10

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that motive of crime has been assigned to the appellant by the injured in his statement stating that about three months ago some minor scuffle took place between the appellant and the injured. Thereafter matter was settled but he suspected that the appellant was having enmity against him. On the fateful day he was beaten by the appellant and three others by lathi and danda. Injured has suffered fractures in the nasal bone and ulna bone. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that it is not clear who was the author of the injury since general role was assigned to all the four accused. It is a case of malicious prosecutions of appellant under the provisions of SC/ST Act. He has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 24.08.2022. In case, the appellant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶11

Per contra, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for informant have supported the order passed by the Sessions court and vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant and submitted that the allegations involved are very serious in nature. But he could not point out any material to the contrary. They further submit that in case the appellant is released on bail, he will again indulge

¶12

in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶13

It appears from the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and from perusal of material on record that the court below has not properly considered the case of the appellant. Hence, in view of the above consideration, the order of rejection of bail passed by the court below dated 13.09.2022 is, hereby, set aside.

¶14

Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant; keeping in view uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; appellant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Court is of the opinion that the appellant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Let appellant, Ramveer, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:

¶16

(i) The appellant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

(ii) The appellant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

¶18

(iii) The appellant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.

¶19

(iv) The appellant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court.

¶20

(v) The appellant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.

¶21

(vi) The appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶22

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. If in the opinion of the trial court that absence of the appellant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed in accordance with law.

¶23

The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law after the release of the appellant, if there is no other legal impediment.

¶24

It is made clear that the observations made in this order are limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.

¶25

The criminal appeal is allowed.

¶26

Order Date :- 23.5.2023 SS

¶27

Digitally signed by :- SURENDAR SINGH NARANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramveer v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramveer v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagma Parveen Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhuruv Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Naushad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramveer Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul Vs State of U.P.and Another

Satya Prakash Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. and Another