Allowed

Ashish Biyar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2023CRLA/8286/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed this criminal appeal against the rejection of bail under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, directing the granting of bail based on the fundamental right to speedy trial and jail overcrowding without deciding the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Appellant to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties.

Ashish Biyar Vs State of U.P. and Another — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:197998

¶2

Court No. - 85

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8286 of 2023

¶4

Appellant :- Ashish Biyar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Saurabh Kumar,Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.

¶6

List has been revised. Despite service of notice upon the opposite party no.2, no one appears on his behalf.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned AGA for opposite party no.1 and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant to set aside the impugned order dated 26.07.2023 whereby the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Sonbhadra has rejected the bail application of the appellant moved by him in Case Crime No. 392 of 2023, under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506, 313 of IPC, and Section 3(2)V of SC/ST Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra.

¶9

The case of the prosecution as per the FIR is that on the pretext of marriage appellant was making physical relations with the prosecutrix and made false promise of marriage with her. On 28.05.2023 at around 4.00 pm when prosecutrix asked to the appellant to marry with her he addressed the prosecutrix with caste related words. The prosecutrix got pregnant with the appellant and she was compelled to abort the child.

¶10

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The prosecutrix was having intimate relations with the appellant and established physical relations at her own accord. The victim refused to undergo for external or internal medical examination. It is submitted that there is no evidence available on record which can indicate that appellant caused miscarriage of the prosecutrix. No offence under Section 376 of IPC is made out against the appellant. It is submitted that appellant has criminal history of one case to his credit which are explained in supplementary affidavit.

¶11

It is a case of malicious prosecution under the provisions of S.C./S.T. Act. Applicant is languishing in jail since 10.07.2023. In case, the appellant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶12

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has supported the order passed by the Sessions court and vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant and submits that the allegations involved are very serious in nature but he could not point out any material to the contrary.

¶13

It appears from the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and from perusal of material on record that the trial court has not properly considered the case of the appellant. Hence, in view of above consideration, the order of rejection of bail passed by the trial court dated 26.07.2023 is, hereby, set aside.

¶14

Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant; appellant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Court is of the opinion that the appellant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Let appellant, Ashish Biyar be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:

¶16

(i) The appellant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

(ii) The appellant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

¶18

(iii) The appellant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.

¶19

(iv) The appellant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence

¶20

when the witnesses are present in the trial court.

¶21

(v) The appellant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.

¶22

(vi) The appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶23

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. If in the opinion of the trial court that absence of the appellant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed in accordance with law.

¶24

The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law after the release of the appellant, if there is no other legal impediment.

¶25

It is made clear that the observations made in this order are limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.

¶26

The criminal appeal is allowed.

¶27

Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Mohit

¶28

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ashish Biyar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish Biyar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu @ Irshad Ali @ Rajali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anupam Singh @ Guluwa Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Smt.Kajal and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Sanju Kumari and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kamalkant Shukla @ Pappu Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others