This order appears to be purely administrative, correcting a clerical error regarding the dates of reservation and delivery in a criminal appeal without addressing legal issues or outcomes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 533 of 2020
Appellant :- Navase Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Amar Bahadur Maurya,Manvendra Nath Singh,Sadaful Islam Jafri,Vidya Shanker Pandey,Vipin Gangwar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,K.N. Raha
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Inadvertently the dates of delivered and reserved are mentioned as 23.5.2023 and 06.6.2023 respectively, but the dates of delivered and reserved shall be read as 06.6.2023 and 23.5.2023 respectively.
This order shall be treated as part of the order of date.
Order Date :- 6.6.2023 Abhishek/Ruchi
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Navase
State of U.P.
Another
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
