The High Court held that the criminal appeal filed by Lakhan @ Satya Narain abated. Conversely, the appeal filed by Udai Narain @ Kallu was declared successful and allowed.
Criminal appeal by Lakhan @ Satya Narain abated; appeal by Udai Narain @ Kallu allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:160737-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 5259 of 2003
Appellant :- Lakhan @ Satya Narain And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Manish Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
The present appeal abates against appellant No. 1-Lakhan @ Satya Narain.
For appellant No. 2-Udai Narain @ Kallu, the present appeal succeeds and is allowed.
For orders, see order of date passed in Criminal Appeal No. 5169 of 2003, Deepak @ Pilla and another.
(Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi, J.) (Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.)
Order Date :- 9.8.2023 Mustaqeem.
Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal by Lakhan @ Satya Narain survives abatement due to death or other grounds.
Whether the criminal appeal filed by Udai Narain @ Kallu succeeded and was allowed.
Lakhan @ Satya Narain
Udai Narain @ Kallu
State of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
