Saleem v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal No. 342 of 2023 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the date of listing to present the appeal.
Criminal Appeal No. 342 of 2023 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the date of listing to present the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:107911
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 342 of 2023
Appellant :- Saleem Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Shyam Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
This case is listed peremptorily today.
On the last occasion no one has turned up to press this appeal. It appears that the appeal has become infructuous. It is not clear whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether appellant has been exonerated or chargesheeted.
Criminal appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.5.2023 SS
Digitally signed by :- SURENDAR SINGH NARANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Saleem
State of U.P.
Siddharth
Surender Singh Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court