Jaakiya Begum v. State of U.P
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as it stood abated due to the expiration of the sole appellant, Jaakiya Begum, during the pendency of the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed; the file is consigned to record.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:57447
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2265 of 2004
Appellant :- Jaakiya Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P Counsel for Appellant :- Rishad Murtaza,Awadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant has already expired during the pendency of the appeal.
Accordingly, in view of the statement of learned counsel for the appellant made at Bar, the appeal on behalf of sole appellant Jaakiya Begum stands abated.
Let the lower court record, if any, be returned back to the court concerned.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 28.8.2023 Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jaakiya Begum
- respondent
State Of U.P
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2265/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court