From the perusal of the record, it is very much clear that neither in the FIR, nor in the statements of the injured persons or the first informant, it has come that any caste based word was used or offence under sections of SC/ST Act was committed because of being the both injured persons of SC/ST community. The initial chargesheet was filed under section 323, 504 and 147 I.P.C. and it was only after filing of chargesheet when the x -ray report of the injured persons was sought, in the additional statement of Veena Chandra it has come that caste based wild abuses were used against them by the appellants. Thus, it is very much clear that witness Veena Chandra who in her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. has not disclosed hurling of any abuse by the appellants in her additional statement, for the first time, she has stated that caste based abuses were used by the appellants. It is clear that the dispute was between the appellants and the first informant and when the appellants allegedly started thrashing the first informant his friend Kamlesh Chandra and his wife came to rescue him, so both Kamlesh Chandra and his wife Mina Chandra were also allegedly thrashed at the hands of the appellants. Initially there was no allegation of using caste based words in the statement of victim Veena Chandra and it was only in her additional statement after more than 8 months of the incident, for the first time, the
