The applicant in a contempt application from 2017 was represented by counsel, but the petitioner failed to appear in person or request an adjournment. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:72674
Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2826 of 2017 Applicant :- Smt. Shanti Tiwari Opposite Party :- Prof. Astar Hasib Vice Chancellor Narendra Dev Univ.And Ors
Counsel for Applicant :- Kunwar Ravi Prakash
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 3.11.2023 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Shanti Tiwari
Prof. Astar Hasib Vice Chancellor Narendra Dev Univ. And Ors
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
